Inference cloud

How Together AI compares

unverifiedcatalog v1

Serverless open-model prices and per-GPU-hour rates for dedicated inference and GPU clusters.

Pricing page · Site · Open in compare

The serverless table was printed under a 'Batch API price' label as well as 'Price per 1M tokens'. The toggle state did not survive extraction. Token rows are the numbers in that table, and the tier is marked ambiguous in the row note.

Regions and compliance

Regions: not published / unverified

Compliance: not published / unverified

Token offerings

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

serverless_api · deepseek-v4.1-flash · open-weight not published / unverified

Input / 1M
0.3together.aichecked 2026-10-20“DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $0.30 $0.006 (cached) | $1.20”
Cached input / 1M
0.006together.aichecked 2026-10-20“DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $0.006 (cached)”
Output / 1M
1.2together.aichecked 2026-10-20“DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $1.20”

Context not published · tokens/s not published · TTFT not published

Taken from the serverless table. A Batch API price label sat above that table, so the tier is ambiguous.

gpt-oss-120B

serverless_api · gpt-oss-120b · open-weight true

Input / 1M
0.15together.aichecked 2026-10-20“gpt-oss-120B | $0.15 | $0.60”
Cached input / 1M
not published / unverifiedtogether.aichecked 2026-10-20“Cached input price not published.”
Output / 1M
0.6together.aichecked 2026-10-20“gpt-oss-120B | $0.60”

Context not published · tokens/s not published · TTFT not published

No cached price was printed in this row. Tier label on the table is ambiguous. Open-weight flag is cited from GroqDocs, which describes the model.

Llama 3.3 70B

serverless_api · llama-3.3-70b · open-weight not published / unverified

Input / 1M
1.04together.aichecked 2026-10-20“Llama 3.3 70B | $1.04 | $1.04”
Cached input / 1M
not published / unverifiedtogether.aichecked 2026-10-20“Cached input price not published.”
Output / 1M
1.04together.aichecked 2026-10-20“Llama 3.3 70B | $1.04”

Context not published · tokens/s not published · TTFT not published

Tier label on the table is ambiguous.

Compute SKUs

HGX H100 cluster 1× H100 · gpu hour · in the run-cost model

On demand
3.99together.aichecked 2026-10-20“NVIDIA HGX H100 | Preemptible $1.99 | ON-Demand $3.99 | per GPU per hour”
Reserved
3.19together.aichecked 2026-10-20“NVIDIA HGX H100 | Reserved 91-180 days | $3.19”
Spot
1.99together.aichecked 2026-10-20“NVIDIA HGX H100 | Preemptible Compute | $1.99”

Reserved figure is the 91–180 day column, not the shortest commit.

HGX H100 dedicated inference 1× H100 · gpu hour · in the run-cost model

On demand
5.49together.aichecked 2026-10-20“Dedicated Inference | NVIDIA HGX H100 | $5.49 | per gpu per hour”
Reserved
not published / unverifiedtogether.aichecked 2026-10-20“Reserved column says Contact sales.”
Spot
not published / unverifiedtogether.aichecked 2026-10-20“No spot rate on the dedicated table.”

Docs say a ready replica can scale to zero. This row still uses the provisioned method because the list price is per GPU-hour while the replica runs.

Propose a correction

This goes to a moderation queue. It changes the catalog only after approval, and the public changelog records who supplied it.

Current value: unverified

How Together AI compares · AgentTune